top of page

Āhlāda or Jouissance due to legal intimidation: follow-up letter to the PCHFL’s Legal Team

Posted on 27/04/2023 (GMT 07:15 hrs)

On 26/04/2023, Mr. Ajay Piramal’s legal team, viz., the DSK Legal, sent us another email in reply to our previous email, which is given as follows:

The following file (follow-up application by the PCHFL) was attached with the email:

We replied on 27/04/2023 to the team, the text of which is given as follows:

Sub: Ahlada or Jouissance due to legal intimidation

Dear DSK Legal team,

I am thanking you again for your defamation suit against six persons as you are publicizing our web-based non-violent civil disobedience movement against the paramavaisnava. I am enjoying the moment of Ahlada or Jouissance due to intimidation,when I am receiving your mails. Me with the fellow DHFL victims have nothing to lose after becoming paupers due to manufactured, predetermined financial abuse or curtailment of business-related rights as enshrined in the United Nations Guiding Principles (the vanishing point of jurisprudence).

I do not understand, when I am putting all the reported speeches gathered from different news sources regarding the paramavaisnava are “false and frivolous”. As I am not a journalist, it is difficult for me to amalgamate all the reports on the DHFL scam and the paramavaisnava. Sometimes I have, with my family, used quasi-direct discourse (a la Voloshinov) to make out the state of affairs happening within the stage of the nation-state called India that is Bharat, the Constitution of which is our the Gita-Bible-Quran.

By the by, what’s about your plaintiff’s 100 crore “compensation” plea (with 18% interest) for the “irreparable damage” suffered by his company due to our voices of resistance against crony and monopoly capitalism in India? As your research and investigation work is very poor, I must mention that there are many websites that are being used in our web-based movement, which have escaped your notice.

Therefore, I demand the compensation of the six defendants should be more in terms of money, given the magnitude of our small protest. A meagre amount of 100 crores is not enough for such an “internationally reputed” billionaire with “philanthropic” concerns!

However, I am bound to say that, “presenting half-truth is more dangerous than lying or hiding facts” because neither you nor your plaintiff have mentioned the verdict of the NCLAT on 27th January, 2022, which made pertinent observations/analyses (deploying the terms “contrary to law”, “material irregularities”, “void” etc., in relation to the DHFL resolution process) with regard to the so-called “approved” resolution plan of the DHFL (kindly refer to my last letter to you, which contains certain relevant excerpts from the said order in this context). For this reason, your client rushed to the Supreme Court of India to get the aforementioned order stayed on 11th April, 2022.

My only question is: why are you hiding the NCLT first order (19/05/2021) and NCLAT second order (27/01/2022)?

I again request you, reiterating my previous three emails, to please join our web-based non-violent movement to save our (inclusive, plural, diverse, syncretic, i.e., the pronoun “our” represents also “your concerns”) progeny in the context of devastating financial “ecosystem” (the term suffers from the fallacy of misplaced concreteness)and catastrophic “natural” ecosystem.

Let the truth be revealed.

Yours Sincerely,

Dr. Debaprasad Bandyopadhyay

Address: Planet Earth; Religion: Atheist or otherwise Agnostic

A supposed homo sapiens sapiens, belonging to manavagotra or earthian or cosmosian

SEE ALSO:

Comments


bottom of page