top of page
Mar 214 min read

Why Did the Wadhawan Brothers Cut A Sorry Figure To Satisfy the BJP’s Itching Palms?

Posted on 21/03/2024 (GMT 17:30 hrs)

Updated on 24/03/2024 (GMT 18:05 hrs)

In continuation with our previous article


Of All the Superrich Wilful Defaulters, Why the Wadhawans alone?

, we wish to ask a few questions after the much controversial exposure of the Electoral Bonds Scam. There is no mention of the Wadhawan Brothers, the ex-(?)owners of the DHFL, in the data published by the SBI (and publicly exposed by the ECI):

We are proud enough that before the publication of such lists, we had inferred that there is an one-to-one correspondence between the rising assets of the ruling party of India and the rampant bankruptcies of the PSUs:


Is there any one-to-one correspondence between Bharatiya Janata Party’s increasing assets and abrupt bankruptcies in India?

Even the legal phrase “Quid Pro Quo” was used by us to denote the relationship between the Flashnet Scam and DHFL Scam, i.e., Piramal and the BJP’s affinities. We have indeed found Piramal’s name in the list of Electoral Bond Donors to have donated 85 crores!!


Quid Pro Quo: BJP and Ajay Piramal


DHFL: Return Gift by BJP to Piramal for Flashnet Scam


Ajay Piramal’s Contributions to the Electoral Bonds

After the expose of the Electoral Bonds Scam, we are not at all surprised by seeing such a correspondence between the corporate and the political parties of India in the context of crony and monopoly capitalism⤡.

However, we are surprised enough that the name of “DHFL” or the “Wadhawans” does not even appear in the list of purchasers or donors, as said before.

It is found that before the Operation Lotus, a patterned event has been noticed. The extortionists like ED, CBI and/or IT Department are specifically targeting the opponent members, leaders as well as sitting chief ministers for performing alleged “financial scams”. After that, the targeted opposition leader/party usually joins the ruling party, which then serves as some kind of a “washing machine”. This is nothing more than a political vendetta with the ill-intent of blackmailing the dissenting parties.


Money Laundering by the Ruling Party of India: An Open Epistle to the Financial Action Task Force (FATF)

To say simply, the Electoral Bonds issue in this context of the BJP-opposition tussle is nothing more than a case of satisfying the itching palms of the ruling party of India by the business tycoons. Many have inferred (rightly) that it is another form of bribery.

However, the question is: why did the Wadhawan brothers as well as Rana Kapoor (YES Bank) cut a sorry figure to satisfy the greedy hands of the BJP? Why were they singled out of all other corporate giants with their shell companies?

The opacity and secrecy of the bonds have made us perplexed, vexed and annoyed. Let us dig our own minds by reflecting on the following points at issue, points at hand:

I. The Wadhawan brothers had already satisfied the ruling party by donating to the latter by opening shell companies a sum of 27.5 crore rupees, as reported in the Cobrapost report in 2019 as well as subsequent press releases by the Indian National Congress.

II. Moreover, there are many means to “donate” (or bribe?) the political parties in India, which include: electoral bonds, electoral trusts, PM CARES Fund (transparently opaque trust?!), terror-funding, hawala etc., in the context of the license raj within post-truth society. The simple thing is that in between the corporates and the ruling party (being the richest and highest earner in Electoral Bonds), there is a certain ‘give-and-take’ or ‘quid-pro-quo’, i.e., “returning of favours” relationship.

III. Each and every corporate has or possesses shell companies for “bribing” aka “donating” to the ruling party of India.

One obvious reason for initiating a bankruptcy process against the Wadhawans’ DHFL in particular was perhaps that the BJP was not satisfied with the comparatively slim amount of 27.5 crore rupees that it received from the Wadhawans.

Moreover, the DHFL, along with its shell companies/fraudulent accounts, “donated”, it maybe assumed, through other means such as terror-funding via the proper channel of Dawood Ibrahim and Iqbal Mirchi. For this reason, electoral bonds’ donors list does not mention them anywhere.

Putting the ongoing DHFL into a bankruptcy process was a “litmus test” case for legitimizing the very ill-conceived code for Bankruptcy, i.e., the IBC (2016), and thus, the DHFL victims were treated as guinea pigs.


DHFL Victims in the Laboratory State of IBC: “Litmus Test”?


Tale of a Guinea Pig Colony

Conclusion

We, after going through the utterly depreciated state of affairs in the Indian as well as global polity, where the crony relationship is serving as the life-blood for ALL parties, hereby stand for a partyless democracy.

Such a partyless society would be free from any arbitrary monetary determination via a centralized autocracy or totalitarian power. Instead, it would promote moneyless, decentralized survival in the context of anthropogenic glocal heating or Anthropocene/Capitalocene in general. The ideal of non-partisan social order would promote horizontal mutual aid instead of hierarchical segregation.

Comments

bottom of page